Originally Posted by
Puddytatt
Because they already agreed to that via MOU 25-02. Except that MOU didn't spell out what was actually involved to consider the technology working.
So what? They could have agreed to pay us all a double share of PS, but they were
adamant they were in compliance - making that irrelevant. Regarding MiCrew sick, our VP was reported to have said something to the effect of, 'just because we had to automate it doesn't mean we have to use it.'. And this is the same management team who said "it's not a violation until an arbitrator says it is". They obfuscate to the point of
absurdity to keep from admitting failure.
And suddenly, they just roll over and admit... failure?? To quote a certain someone, "come on, man!"