Your data is not wrong, it's highly skewed to push your agenda of doom. Choosing a date in the middle of a long stretch of not hiring as your start point for showing no growth isn't genuine in proving anything other than we were stagnant for 2 years thanks to Boeing and a catastophic failure. Just like choosing a date in 2019 right before we started offloading Airbus after a merger isn't genuine in showing a lack of fleet growth (never mind that something else was happening in the world to push the company to offload terrible leases). You are picking worst-case scenarios that center on your agenda of how terrible this place is managed. We're a net positive 12 airframes for the year and even more if you include the HAL fleet (see how anyone can focus on different data points to "prove" a point?). You were adamant that we would still be smaller fleet-wise through the end of this year until it was obvious we wouldn't be and you'll do the same with pilot count until that changes. Then you'll find a different drum to pound. Rinse, repeat. You're predictable and unoriginal. You've been unhappy here since you were hired and I just don't understand how anyone can live their life like that. I've mostly stopped responding to you and I'll likely go back to doing so because you're a broken record and it's a tiring circular argument and neither of us knows what the future actually holds but you are adamant that it won't be good. I'm hopeful it will be.