Originally Posted by
Liberty
It’s a bizarre claim by a few. It’s equivalent to the flat earth group. The idea is that SWA decided on AUS as a crew base because SAT had bad behavior so, in the end, we showed them. If you confront these guys about this odd view, they shift the burden of proof and want you to prove that SAT was not going to be a base. It’s really weird. I don’t know what the motive is to construct this imagination.
what??? You think AUS and SAT negotiations occurred in a vacuum? Crew base decision aside, you’re out of your mind if you think the investment decisions had zero correlation with each other.