View Single Post
Old 01-20-2026 | 05:44 PM
  #221  
notEnuf's Avatar
notEnuf
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,410
Likes: 882
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Viper25
In the new agreement, there would no longer be violations of assignment notifications. That isn't a bad thing. Whatever novel violations pop-up, should have penalties.

Hopefully, in general, violations decrease, and a huge quid is gained, while nothing *contractually* meaningful changes (robot vs human).
You are definitely a glass half full type but hope is not a strategy or an executable plan. If something benefits the company there will be "press to test violations." What really benefits the company is removing the penalties so "press to test" is free and encouraged. This is middle management ladder climber chum in the water. You seem serious in this exchange but I can't agree with your faith in a new, completely rewritten, thereby removing every precedent and historical norm, coverage system. Call me a skeptic but a complete rewrite is probably the worst thing we can do. I'll just go on record now as saying... I DID THINK THEY WOULD DO THAT.

Last edited by notEnuf; 01-20-2026 at 05:55 PM.
Reply