View Single Post
Old 01-21-2026 | 05:13 AM
  #228  
FangsF15's Avatar
FangsF15
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,386
Likes: 1,427
Default

Originally Posted by Viper25
Sure. I'm just being logical. I can't see how there would be an INCREASE in notification violations if robots were approved for use instead of humans.

And in that post you quoted, I affirmed that whatever new shenanigans sprout from "we didn't think they'd do that" should absolutely have guardrails and penalties.
What I think you may be missing (or not acknowledging?) is that when the company fails to properly notify a pilot, that still is a good thing for us. I’ve had multiple episodes of this over the years, whether they be improper/lack of legal rest notification (getting me 30 more hours off), or failure to properly notify of a trip (getting the trip removed), or even better, failure to notify of a change and having it noop (removed with pay).

So it’s not only affirmative actions that can cause ‘harm’, it can also be the lack of proper notification that can benefit.

It would absolutely be a concession to allow CNO for everything. Maybe it’s worth a trade for a big enough quid, but it’s absolutely a concession.
Reply