View Single Post
Old 01-21-2026 | 05:29 AM
  #229  
Viper25's Avatar
Viper25
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 360
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
What I think you may be missing (or not acknowledging?) is that when the company fails to properly notify a pilot, that still is a good thing for us. I’ve had multiple episodes of this over the years, whether they be improper/lack of legal rest notification (getting me 30 more hours off), or failure to properly notify of a trip (getting the trip removed), or even better, failure to notify of a change and having it noop (removed with pay).

So it’s not only affirmative actions that can cause ‘harm’, it can also be the lack of proper notification that can benefit.

It would absolutely be a concession to allow CNO for everything. Maybe it’s worth a trade for a big enough quid, but it’s absolutely a concession.
I absolutely understand how this situation improves QOL and why people claim it’s a concession. That’s specifically why I used this example.

It’s only a concession that you lose the *remedy* for their mistakes.

Their mistakes increase our QOL, not any actual contract provision.

That’s why it’s not a contractual concession.
Reply