Originally Posted by
marcal
I
Also - the whistleblower is nuts. There is a 100+ page court filing detailing the entire story from way before she was grounded. Read that, plus the grandiosity and website and books, and her recent social media and there is no question why they believed she was nuts.
Shocking. Another company-centric position.
I don't want to wade to far into it...I have read every filing from that case, across years and years. The company paid a crooked shrink orders of magnitude more than market cost for a psych test to get their preferred diagnosis. Said shrink had to forfeit his license as a result.
A panel of doctors at the Mayo clinic rejected the company's diagnosis.
The whistleblower was completely vindicated in the end. Graham was a bad actor, and Dickson was on board every step of the way.