Originally Posted by
ancman
Yeah, proving that a commuter wasn’t in position for SC is nearly impossible for the company, unless a pilot actually admits to it.
I think of all the times I commuted in for SC on an OAL carrier. At best, Delta can see a KCM and CASS inquiry at a pilot’s home airport — which proves little. Even then, those two inquiries don’t happen 100% of the time.
Supposedly, the 4 pilots fired off the 747 pre-Covid were ‘proven’ scammers with a
complete lack of KCM/CASS, not to mention JS/Non-Rev hits. Unconfirmed, of course, but several of them reportedly had zero ‘fingerprints’ for
any commute in 2 years.
The only reason 3 of the 4 got their jobs back was because there was no progressive discipline. The fourth was a regular offender with a history of many other issues and did not get their job back. The 3 who did had to repay the ‘wage theft’ of all the SC for which they had not commuted in. Not to mention months of lost wages.
Circumstantial evidence is still evidence. And can be plenty strong to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. “How did you get to work from 3 states over without
once scanning KCM/TSA, Non-Rev/JS, or any other searchable database?”
I have zero - ZERO - sympathy for anyone truly scamming the company like this, because the rest of us have to pay for the collateral damage for years to come. They deserve a defense, but not an unlimited one (depending on the facts and evidence presented, of course). It’s hard to credibly argue, for example, that you were genuinely sick every time you were given an assignment over several years, but ONLY when given an assignment (if that’s the allegation). That’s statistically impossible. Anyone ever read
Freakonomics”?