Originally Posted by
tennisguru
In the case of the 747 pilots? Because the company went straight to termination without first going through the regular steps of discipline, like letters of warning and such.
Exactly. And they did so, in part, by claiming that a lack of evidence of past commutes served as adequate proof that they were never in position for past unused SCs. The company’s claim was that they were already “repeat offenders”, based on evidence that didn’t exist.