Originally Posted by
JustInFacts
He says anonymously.
Trolling, or just really that dense?
Originally Posted by
JustInFacts
There are other committees and teams that do not have a list of people published.
So? How many of them appear to be hell bent on a 50%+1 contract?
Originally Posted by
JustInFacts
Who was on the negotiating support team? What about SPSC, they have a budget of over $1.1 million. I can't find the list of P2P pilots anywhere.
No idea, and if it concerned me I'd ask. It doesn't. Having people tell me what's good and bad in a TA does. And if those FACTs come from the more prolific SM yes-men or JF 'pot-stirrers', I want to know and apply the appropriate amount of credibility to it.
Originally Posted by
JustInFacts
Seems like pot stirring and caring more about the messenger than the message.
Good reference to the strange paragraph that really tanked the current NC credibility for me. I want the current MEC and NC to succeed. And I want to trust them and the process. Moronic missives against pilots debating the pros and cons of TA'd sections don't help. Labeling people pot-stirrers doesn't either....but it does expose the yes-to-anything crowd.
Frankly this whole anonymous FACT team push and defense is bizarre. "Nothing to see here, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"