Search

Notices

FACT TEAM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2026 | 03:47 PM
  #81  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 137
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Iwa Washi
Absolutely, 100% incorrect. TA23 failed first and foremost due to pay rates and a "bonus" which were below industry standard and flat out insulting. Most "No" voters had already made up their minds before even leaving the "Compensation" section, and started diving into all of the concessions - which only reinforced their decision and belief that TA23 was a retirement improvement at the expense of everything else.

You sound more and more like a management hack and company sympathizer with each and every post.
the company and their unconscionable buddy were even greedy enough to try and buy votes with the 12 year scale yet leave the 75 on a b scale while simultaneously arguing the 76 rates being the highest in the industry. Can’t have it both ways May you bum.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Safety
2
09-07-2011 12:20 PM
Lindenberg
Career Questions
7
09-15-2010 02:37 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
2
09-10-2009 03:10 PM
sardinesnack
Cargo
120
06-10-2009 11:29 AM
2a5x1
Flight Schools and Training
0
04-21-2008 06:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices