Old 03-08-2026 | 07:50 AM
  #11736  
Abouttime2fish's Avatar
Abouttime2fish
Line Holder
Veteran: Marine Corp
10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 161
From: MD88
Default

Originally Posted by Verdell
I can see a viewpoint that blames auto-accept for 23M7 usage, but now that QS are a thing, I don't see how auto-accept can be blamed when there are NO TAKERS for a QS.

Literally any eligible pilot with a QS in can raise their hand for a QS trip. When nobody does, auto-accept had nothing to do with it.

If anything, QS are shining a bright light on the fact that auto-accept was never the fundamental problem.
ATL 73NA…. They’ve covered 1 and only 1 trip since the 0700 PCS run. And that was P coded. I’ll save you looking it up 😁. 23k greater than original.
Reply