Thread: Hormuz impacts
View Single Post
Old 03-17-2026 | 09:56 AM
  #245  
tripled
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 155
From: Big ones
Default

Originally Posted by MeteorA113
This thread tumbled.

It's not complicated to figure out. This administration has a history of making wild decisions without considering the ramifications of said decisions. Simply put, they decided to attack thinking this would be a win for them, help their alliance with Israel, mask it under disguise that they are "helping" the people of Iran from a brutal dictator.

Now they are stuck in a situation where they can't back out without looking weak, a more brutal leadership might take over, their supporters and most American citizens don't support this operation, Europe has even less reason to work with us, price of oil reaching all time highs, our military contractors can't produce nearly enough arsenal to keep up with this sudden demand for weaponry because of this poor deployment. All of this was preventable. They didn't have to attack. But emotions drove this admin into this situation and therefore all of us with them.
In your opinion, how many humans were involved in the “wild” decision to push the button that launched a missile or a bomb on the first Iranian target?