Hormuz impacts
#371
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,546
Likes: 1,151
Last edited by CBreezy; 03-20-2026 at 07:16 AM.
#372
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,164
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Seems like a lot of people think that the Iranian government is like other governments. They are jihadist, you can't negotiate or come to terms with jihadist as their motivation is to exterminate you.
The problem of Iran having ballistic missiles, drones and nuclear weapons will never be eliminated until the source is eliminated.
The problem of Iran having ballistic missiles, drones and nuclear weapons will never be eliminated until the source is eliminated.
For our purposes a Regime 2.0 that has learned some very painful lessons, and has significantly fewer resources to export trouble would probably be an acceptable end-state. They would have to be monitored carefully, DON'T trust but do verify.
Safe to say, we don't have any appetite for nation building, at least not the physical kind that requires BoG.
#373
The underlying sticking point is their stated commitment exterminate IL. It is well established that at least some folks in the regime actually mean it. For the US (and other countries to a lesser degrees) there are vast political, geopolitical, and moral problems with that.
I'm not optimistic, because IRGC is now so deeply integrated into most aspects of society. But if that could happen, yes game changer for sure.
For our purposes a Regime 2.0 that has learned some very painful lessons, and has significantly fewer resources to export trouble would probably be an acceptable end-state. They would have to be monitored carefully, DON'T trust but do verify.
Safe to say, we don't have any appetite for nation building, at least not the physical kind that requires BoG.
I'm not optimistic, because IRGC is now so deeply integrated into most aspects of society. But if that could happen, yes game changer for sure.
For our purposes a Regime 2.0 that has learned some very painful lessons, and has significantly fewer resources to export trouble would probably be an acceptable end-state. They would have to be monitored carefully, DON'T trust but do verify.
Safe to say, we don't have any appetite for nation building, at least not the physical kind that requires BoG.
I think this could have gone nuclear very easily. Atomic bombs are scarcely at the leading edge of technology any more. The Trinity Site blast was over 80 years ago. Fast breeder reactors from reprocessed nuclear power plant fuel is also old technology, and at that point you can easily make plutonium based weapons in quantity.
https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3483.html
It doesn’t require the brightest minds to invent the technology, it’s now been around for a couple of generations.
Lets not pretend we can ever allow religious lunatics unfettered access to this technology. Or ICBMs for that matter.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



