Search

Notices

Hormuz impacts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2026 | 07:06 AM
  #371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,546
Likes: 1,151
Default

Originally Posted by AverageGPA
That’s exactly what you guys have done for many pages.

Here’s a direct quote from you.



Very disappointed in you guys.
I'm not supporting them. I'm asking if you can blame them for not accepting terms that would make them critically reliable on the US in perpetuity especially after the same administration has reneged on several deals with when our closest allies and was the one that tore up the previous deal with Iran. Being able to see nuance and defending them murdering civilians are not the same thing.

Last edited by CBreezy; 03-20-2026 at 07:16 AM.
Old 03-20-2026 | 07:25 AM
  #372  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,164
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Bauers
Seems like a lot of people think that the Iranian government is like other governments. They are jihadist, you can't negotiate or come to terms with jihadist as their motivation is to exterminate you.

The problem of Iran having ballistic missiles, drones and nuclear weapons will never be eliminated until the source is eliminated.
The underlying sticking point is their stated commitment exterminate IL. It is well established that at least some folks in the regime actually mean it. For the US (and other countries to a lesser degrees) there are vast political, geopolitical, and moral problems with that.

Originally Posted by Joe Bauers
Iran is a great candidate for nation building, they have a population that is one of the most educated in the world. Imagine Iran as a liberal democracy, it would transform the ME.
I'm not optimistic, because IRGC is now so deeply integrated into most aspects of society. But if that could happen, yes game changer for sure.

For our purposes a Regime 2.0 that has learned some very painful lessons, and has significantly fewer resources to export trouble would probably be an acceptable end-state. They would have to be monitored carefully, DON'T trust but do verify.

Safe to say, we don't have any appetite for nation building, at least not the physical kind that requires BoG.
Old 03-20-2026 | 08:24 AM
  #373  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,256
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The underlying sticking point is their stated commitment exterminate IL. It is well established that at least some folks in the regime actually mean it. For the US (and other countries to a lesser degrees) there are vast political, geopolitical, and moral problems with that.



I'm not optimistic, because IRGC is now so deeply integrated into most aspects of society. But if that could happen, yes game changer for sure.

For our purposes a Regime 2.0 that has learned some very painful lessons, and has significantly fewer resources to export trouble would probably be an acceptable end-state. They would have to be monitored carefully, DON'T trust but do verify.

Safe to say, we don't have any appetite for nation building, at least not the physical kind that requires BoG.
There is a price to be paid for allowing 47 years of “Death to America” to permeate a society, whatever it’s potential. Perhaps the current operations should have been decades ago but - like fixing social security or the national debt - procrastinating bought domestic political advantage. But eventually, reality really does assert itself.

I think this could have gone nuclear very easily. Atomic bombs are scarcely at the leading edge of technology any more. The Trinity Site blast was over 80 years ago. Fast breeder reactors from reprocessed nuclear power plant fuel is also old technology, and at that point you can easily make plutonium based weapons in quantity.

https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3483.html

It doesn’t require the brightest minds to invent the technology, it’s now been around for a couple of generations.

Lets not pretend we can ever allow religious lunatics unfettered access to this technology. Or ICBMs for that matter.
Old 03-20-2026 | 09:17 AM
  #374  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,351
Likes: 1,365
Default

Putting this thread on timeout for a bit. If not forever.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pilot1001
Pilot Health
60
04-06-2024 07:02 AM
preflight
Endeavor Air
175
10-19-2021 12:03 PM
preflight
Endeavor Air
53
01-26-2019 10:51 PM
FlyingJman
United
26
04-06-2016 03:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices