Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Alaska/Virgin impacts on UA? >

Alaska/Virgin impacts on UA?

Search
Notices

Alaska/Virgin impacts on UA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2016, 06:55 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
FlyingJman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Transitioning
Posts: 84
Default Alaska/Virgin impacts on UA?

Anyone have any speculation on any direct or tangential impacts to United if this potential merger goes through?

Last edited by FlyingJman; 04-03-2016 at 06:59 AM. Reason: grammar
FlyingJman is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 07:38 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

UAL will probably offer preferential hiring to furloughed VQIA employees. April fools.. Seriously, unless someone has a crystal ball, nobody knows the answer to your question. Too early to tell. The only constant is change in this industry.
PerfInit is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 08:15 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 783
Default

UAL upped their service between ewr-sfo and ewr-lax to almost hourly after Virgin started that route in 2013. I think you are going to see an even bigger push to wide bodies with lay flat seats to over saturate the market.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 08:22 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Talking

My commuting options hopefully won't change...
DashTrash is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 09:01 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus View Post
I think you are going to see an even bigger push to wide bodies with lay flat seats to over saturate the market.
The reconfigured "A" model 777s being reconfigured back for the domestic configuration are also fuel efficient and fully deprecated aircraft with LOTS of F and E+ seats.

Simply over saturating the market does not necessarily help UA....but lots of room for high-revenue passengers in a widebody aircraft is a serious competitive advantage.

For the first time in a long time I'm cautiously optimistic that UAL is actually interested in competing and not simply operating.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 10:44 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingJman View Post
Anyone have any speculation on any direct or tangential impacts to United if this potential merger goes through?
Why does it matter? Would anyone change their employment choice or bidding preferences over this?

With all due tangential respect.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 11:36 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr View Post
The reconfigured "A" model 777s being reconfigured back for the domestic configuration are also fuel efficient and fully deprecated aircraft with LOTS of F and E+ seats.

Simply over saturating the market does not necessarily help UA....but lots of room for high-revenue passengers in a widebody aircraft is a serious competitive advantage.

For the first time in a long time I'm cautiously optimistic that UAL is actually interested in competing and not simply operating.









250 wide bodies by 2021 will be flown by 6250 pilots per man power staffing of a wide body aircraft (25 per plane, includes the instructors at TK)

51 767
88 777
35 A350
76 787
Sniper66 is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 05:28 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Contrail06's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: B757/B767 Right
Posts: 177
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingJman View Post
Anyone have any speculation on any direct or tangential impacts to United if this potential merger goes through?
Best guess, we will have an opportunity to bid for some more slots somewhere in the system.
Contrail06 is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 05:50 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
aileronjam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: It keeps changing.
Posts: 206
Default

What are the odds that AS will want to keep and operate the newly acquired Airbus fleet? If not, who might be in line to obtain these aircraft?
aileronjam is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 07:32 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by aileronjam View Post
What are the odds that AS will want to keep and operate the newly acquired Airbus fleet? If not, who might be in line to obtain these aircraft?
Probably way to early to know what will happen or where the airplanes will go IF they do not keep them.

(FWIW, VA has CFM motors on their Airbuses while UA has V2500.)
cadetdrivr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CaptainMark
Cargo
70
07-15-2007 05:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices