Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Fdx Loa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2007, 01:35 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
CaptainMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FDX A300 CPT
Posts: 967
Default Fdx Loa

Just talked to my mgmt source....company will open bases under CBA if LOA is voted down...no negotiations...until i get more info..later
CaptainMark is offline  
Old 07-12-2007, 01:38 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: A300/310 Capt
Posts: 1,642
Default

Well atleast that would be on a volunteer basis.
fedupbusdriver is offline  
Old 07-12-2007, 01:43 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 424
Default

That's fine with me. At least we can't get nonvol'd....
nightfreight is offline  
Old 07-12-2007, 01:50 PM
  #4  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Special Temporary Vacancies (STVs)[One of the concerns on this LOA we have heard from our members surrounds the ability of FedEx to inversely assign STV positions. While we acknowledge that it could happen, we do not think this will occur. The benefits of the STV are such that bid awards will likely go senior. While some of us may be unable or unwilling to accept an FDA assignment, others may desire the opportunity to take their spouse or entire families to either location, with roundtrip travel from their home to the foreign base paid by FedEx. We suspect there is a greater chance that junior pilots will not be able to hold the STVs than they will be inversed into them.]

This quote from LEC 22. Guys, there many be many things not to like about this LOA but for all those spun up over STV, I agree 100% with this assessment. If tomorrow, the Co said they needed 30 A-300 crews in HKG and CDG for 3 months, live in a hotel, int'l per diem, int'l override, round trip for family.......etc....it would go VERY senior. In fact, if there was a STV, many would vol back to back for months on end. The chance of some juniority guy getting tagged is way remote. So...vote against it for some other reason...this is a pig in a poke.
AerisArmis is offline  
Old 07-12-2007, 01:56 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Haywood JB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: Who knows...waiting for a bid
Posts: 379
Default

AA

For that and that alone. The situation is just that if I have no choice, I get forced. Remote chance is not a 100% guarentee that I am not going to get forced to stay in Paris or Hong Kong. You can't offer me that protection, and this LOA opens that up. So unless that is changed, I am going to spread the word for that reason alone. I, like some of the other junior pilots, don't want to take the chance of being sent away from my family for three months because the bid was supposed to go senior.

Vote no for those guys in the bottom percentiles. STV=NO for me!
Haywood JB is offline  
Old 07-12-2007, 02:01 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 424
Default

AA,
Then take it out of the LOA and I would vote for it.

This "isn't probably gonna happen" is BS. Why give the company this contract language in the first place? Are these guys for real???
nightfreight is offline  
Old 07-12-2007, 02:15 PM
  #7  
Bourgeoisie
 
MEMFO4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 787 SO
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by nightfreight View Post
AA,
Then take it out of the LOA and I would vote for it.

This "isn't probably gonna happen" is BS. Why give the company this contract language in the first place? Are these guys for real???
Agreed. Kind of like letting the camel's nose under the tent. We don't even need to go down this road. The company already has too much control.
MEMFO4Ever is offline  
Old 07-12-2007, 02:17 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: B757 Capt
Posts: 177
Default

LOA=DOA, IMHO.

Vote no!
Gooch121 is offline  
Old 07-12-2007, 02:27 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
machz990's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 777 CAP
Posts: 494
Default

Still a big NO for me!
machz990 is offline  
Old 07-12-2007, 02:27 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 424
Default

I am all for a bid right after the LOA fails. If someone is dumb enough to bid CDG or HKG under the current contract, so be it. Hopefully the bid will close before age 65 passes. Hopefully it will keep some of the over 60 engineers in their position until the next bid comes around. Also, with the -10 excess bid out, alot of these guys will be Boeing engineers....
nightfreight is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MAWK90
Cargo
245
03-07-2011 06:54 AM
av8torguy
Cargo
124
07-25-2007 11:12 PM
Flycast
Cargo
24
07-07-2007 01:13 AM
TonyM
Cargo
5
07-04-2007 08:39 PM
CloudSailor
Cargo
11
07-03-2007 01:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices