View Single Post
Old 03-20-2026 | 03:10 PM
  #301  
flyprdu
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Do you really think bomb damage assessment Intel is 100% accurate? On deep underground bunkers?

More fool you then. If you don’t get secondary explosions (which with 60% enhanced Uranium you won’t) BDA likely doesn’t mean squat. I used to work in an underground bunker with a rubble field over it and it was ALLEGEDLY good to withstand tactical nukes. Fortunately, I never had occasion to test that though.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/...are-fake-news/

So tell me, were they lying then or are they lying now?