Originally Posted by
FangsF15
I can’t believe I’m weighing in here, but is it not possible that the best assessment/belief at the time was that the Fordow facilities were destroyed/obliterated, and that sometime later - after Iran doubled or tripled their efforts and went all in - got to a point where intel proved that earlier assessment obsolete, or even wrong in hindsight? It doesn’t make one or the other a lie, necessarily. Hyperbole is this president’s love language, btw. Just answering the question in good faith that you actually are seeking a plausible answer.
what are your thoughts on the tulsi gabbard depo where she said they had not reconstituted their nuclear capes and also refused to answer if iran was an imminent threat? Imo this does not allow for your assessment to be valid