Originally Posted by
AntiCompanyMan
Why do you get to have the last word when there is ample evidence that what you're saying is objectively incorrect? It wasn't a single member; it was institutional and facilitated from the very top.
Reporting in the Times of Israel, the New York Times, Business Insider etc demonstrates that this is not "conspiracy stuff."
I understanding you want to avoid partisan bickering, but you're being partisan by disallowing fact based information merely because it conflicts with your opinion while also insisting that your explicitly partisan take is the objective one.
Don't complain about partisan bickering while also contributing to it.
Multiple "things" can be true at the same time, even if they produce apparent paradoxes.
History is repleat with hubristic actors attempting to influence events by manipulating individuals or groups that end up not following the script. Possibly like Hamas?
Example:
When asked why Hindenburg, bowing to the advice of Franz von Papen and others, had named Hitler as chancellor in January 1933, von Papen replied, "You are wrong, we have only hired him."
It didn't work out as planned.
Consequences from actions taken continue for eternity.
People who substitute action for deliberation usually get poor results, and frequently seed long-term catastrophe.
Hedgehogs are not noted for either their ability to consider multiple factors simultaneously or for their imagination.