Originally Posted by
Viper25
If they don’t reduce the value of 23m/month, and just redistribute it elsewhere, is it not still a win for them operationally even though not financially? Not saying I disagree with you in general though. There needs to be a steep cost to them for us to help them out of their mess.
I think this is going to be a major sticking point and serious propaganda fodder for a small but vocal percent of the list that will see a substantial decrease in pay and an equal substantial increase in work. It doesn't matter what's in the contract for the farmers. We just have to make sure to fairly evaluate an agreement and not let people who would never agree to fix m7 in the first place drive the boat.