Search

Notices

Openers today?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Today | 10:51 AM
  #501  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 889
Likes: 236
Default

For any kind of a slip call, the safety onus is on the pilot, not the company. The pilot voluntarily enters a slip that says it's ok to call at 2am. The pilot voluntarily accepts the offer, and it's on the pilot to make sure they are safe to do it.

The only safety argument ALPA might have is with IA calls, and those are pretty rare now (until the gummster fire gets out of control in another couple months at least).

Should they be trying to avoid the 2am calls when possible? Absolutely! Arguing a safety/fatigue angle is a fool's errand though.
Reply
Old Today | 12:27 PM
  #502  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 200
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Khantahr
For any kind of a slip call, the safety onus is on the pilot, not the company. The pilot voluntarily enters a slip that says it's ok to call at 2am. The pilot voluntarily accepts the offer, and it's on the pilot to make sure they are safe to do it.

The only safety argument ALPA might have is with IA calls, and those are pretty rare now (until the gummster fire gets out of control in another couple months at least).

Should they be trying to avoid the 2am calls when possible? Absolutely! Arguing a safety/fatigue angle is a fool's errand though.
Valid…………..
Reply
Old Today | 12:48 PM
  #503  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,124
Likes: 81
Default

Originally Posted by Khantahr
For any kind of a slip call, the safety onus is on the pilot, not the company. The pilot voluntarily enters a slip that says it's ok to call at 2am. The pilot voluntarily accepts the offer, and it's on the pilot to make sure they are safe to do it.

The only safety argument ALPA might have is with IA calls, and those are pretty rare now (until the gummster fire gets out of control in another couple months at least).

Should they be trying to avoid the 2am calls when possible? Absolutely! Arguing a safety/fatigue angle is a fool's errand though.
This will be Delta legal’s argument in the courtroom. Personally, I wouldn’t want billions of dollars of liability to rest on that argument after a theoretical accident.

As far as I can tell there is zero attempt to avoid interrupting Pilot WOCLs en mass. I think there’s a case to be made that slips should all default to not being called between midnight and 5 AM and pilots seeking to offer their overtime services should have to actively waive uninterrupted sleep opportunity there. That’s what we have to do to waive the contractual protections regarding Wocl.

I’m just one pilot though. If you all think tens of thousands of sleep, ll-interrupting phone calls in the middle of the night are just the cost of doing business, so be it.

Reply
Old Today | 01:45 PM
  #504  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 889
Likes: 236
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
This will be Delta legal’s argument in the courtroom. Personally, I wouldn’t want billions of dollars of liability to rest on that argument after a theoretical accident.

As far as I can tell there is zero attempt to avoid interrupting Pilot WOCLs en mass. I think there’s a case to be made that slips should all default to not being called between midnight and 5 AM and pilots seeking to offer their overtime services should have to actively waive uninterrupted sleep opportunity there. That’s what we have to do to waive the contractual protections regarding Wocl.

I’m just one pilot though. If you all think tens of thousands of sleep, ll-interrupting phone calls in the middle of the night are just the cost of doing business, so be it.
Slips default to off. You won't get a call in the middle of the night if you don't actively seek it out. The company will 100% win that argument in court every single time, and I'm glad ALPA isn't wasting any time trying.
Reply
Old Today | 04:07 PM
  #505  
Viper25's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 280
Default

MEC Weekly seemed to suggest negotiations are slowly making some progress. Seems talks are constructive and nothing implying any slowdowns or stall tactics.
Reply
Old Today | 05:44 PM
  #506  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 118
From: Big ones
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
How do you know they didn't start coverage earlier? And becuase of the 80 pilots who had OOBWS in, it took 16 hours just to get through that step?

Different bases....you mean the PWA allowed "Y" trips for OOB Reserve use only?
no. Not the Y rotations (which also need to go away imo). These are dtw0xxx rotations that sit a while and then become atl0xxxx rotations that cover some of the same legs on the same day at the same time with the same flight number. Foul.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Military
11
10-07-2011 02:53 PM
SrfNFly227
Regional
48
06-11-2009 09:02 PM
jungle
Money Talk
2
02-19-2009 07:50 PM
Longbow64
Flight Schools and Training
18
12-19-2007 05:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices