View Single Post
Old Yesterday | 05:31 AM
  #2593  
Biffsteritis
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 153
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
could be either. Whoever it is can’t seem to explain why the company is locked into den only sim training. Just Like f9 driver alluded to just because you keep yelling the same thing over and over doesn’t make it true.
In other news I’ve seen las upgrade sim and I did covid cola landings sim in las. That’s past practice none den training sim. I would be surprised if any grievances were filed at any point because there’s no language that it violates. I’ll go out on a limb and guess that’s part of the reason why legal and the reasonable lec reps believe there’s limited leverage with aqp.
Read your contract: 25.H.9.b “All pilots will attend simulator training (for recurrent ref 25.H) in Denver . . .”

Hence, why the LOA is required. It changes book. Forget AQP, just imagine the cost savings on hotels, per diem, dh, and transportation to and from the sim if recurrent can be done in your base. All of those expenses are transferred directly to the pilot. No big deal if you live in base, but could be costly for the commuters.

I don’t even know who JH is referring to, but I’m am not him/her. Just a line pilot with an opinion that differs from yours.

Last edited by Biffsteritis; Yesterday at 05:44 AM.
Reply