Originally Posted by
rickair7777
There's some threshold where they would have agonized over the use, even back then. We could come up with countless hypothetical scenarios and argue all day as to what they would have decided, but I'm not wasting energy on alternate history fantasies.
As I said, "culprits to target". But since 9/11 was 100% an attack against civilians, it actually would be proportional to nuke an equivalent number of enemy civilians, if that's what you wanted to (to say nothing of military targets). There's nothing magical about a nuclear weapon that make them any more or less proportional than any other weapon. Yes, we can target and "dial-a-yield" to achieve specific end results.
What is an "enemy civilian"?