View Single Post
Old 05-13-2026 | 12:28 PM
  #51  
FangsF15's Avatar
FangsF15
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 1,343
Default

Originally Posted by dera
Im curious why you think company funded disability is better than an outside policy?
Maybe you'll convince me otherwise, but here are some thoughts...

For one, it's free to me (or pre-negotiated, however you want to think of it).

For two, as I understand them, it generally comes with better terms. [At DL, disability pays 50% of the highest 12 consecutive months in the last 36, with no offsets unless you exceed the 'original' 100% threshold (which is super unlikely/rare), and includes Profit Sharing and potential "retro" pay in the calculation. And, it continues to whatever the FAA mandated retirement is - so age 67 is already baked in (if it happens).] I had a buddy who had a huge year with the last contract's Retro pay and the following year's Profit Sharing being in the same 12 months. He actually got a pay raise on disability from what he had been making, lol. Not that it's typical, but still...

For (maybe) three, and I say this not actually knowing what other companies do... Being contractual and 'in house' at DL, we don't have an outside company* materially getting in the middle of it do deny or reduce benefits. Like how UHC makes health care a nightmare as a third party. *Harvey Watt does administer DL's disability program, but having used it twice, my experience was very simple and easy with them. They basically just validate your sickness, and send a 'thumbs up' back to the company - that's it.

For four, and I can't believe I'm saying this, but I trust DL to pay up more than I trust XYZ mutual to pay up. Or said another way, I trust XYZ less...

ALPA also has some optional disability insurances, which I do pay separately for, and came in very handy when I had a major event. But that's beyond the scope, I think?

Why do you think outside policy is better? Genuinely curious.
Reply