Originally Posted by
ancman
What you’re describing is management’s cost problem, not an operational problem.
With QS/IA+M7 and SC+M7, management already has adequate tools at their disposal to fix the operation. They simply don’t want to absorb the cost, especially on a permanent basis.
For RG, the quick deal negotiations were all about escaping AA/M7 at a discount. It was never about restoring the operation to him. I’m glad that it failed, as it means that the NC/MEC valued our leverage appropriately and held the line.
It will take RG and the rest of management longer to accept the fact that their costs are never going away, even if AA/M7 eventually changes.
Of course it's a management cost decision.
Where does the RES step of the coverage ladder happen again?
AA is what they want. They better do the calculus on that it's going to come with a hefty price tag.
Further this cancellation -palooza is a nexus. Staffing, coverage efficiency (a lack thereof) and rotation construction.
They arrived to this destination thru a series of really poor decisions. RG is not deft enough to figure a way out of it He's the bull in a china shop approach where what is needed is elegance and precision.