Originally Posted by
Superpilot92
. Either way the cost to furlough for probably less than a year would be more than to keep us on and actually maintain staffing levels. People are also still retiring and i assure you once the equity is established a large chunk of the "gummers" will probably punch out. Mgmt knows this and knows they cant really rely on these guys sticking around. My point is there are a lot of factors that point to No furloughs. Fingers crossed

The last time around, we were told that it was cheaper to just sit someone rather than furlough them if they were going to be out less than 6 months.