View Single Post
Old 06-25-2008 | 06:45 AM
  #143  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Justdoinmyjob
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
. Either way the cost to furlough for probably less than a year would be more than to keep us on and actually maintain staffing levels. People are also still retiring and i assure you once the equity is established a large chunk of the "gummers" will probably punch out. Mgmt knows this and knows they cant really rely on these guys sticking around. My point is there are a lot of factors that point to No furloughs. Fingers crossed
The last time around, we were told that it was cheaper to just sit someone rather than furlough them if they were going to be out less than 6 months.
Reply