Originally Posted by
SaltyDog
Am sure you would agree, that is why we desire experience in the cockpit.
Experience is what you get when you were expecting something else, right?
An example: OAK-SDF. SVR turbulence was keeping traffic low in the west. It was known, and dispatch allowed the fuel necessary to remain low through the forecast area. When we were supposed to climb, we went non RVSM compliant (instrument problems). ATC would not approve RVSM alt. We would remain low. It was our 'problem' and though we asked ATC for RVSM relief, they were not obligated to approve for safety reasons. We then arranged a plan to land at a place company could minimize service disruption should we not meet fuel calculated to be safe on deck at just below FOM recommended landing fuel.
Interesting event and one that may not be unusual. I will recheck the ASRs to see what is there about going non-RVSM.