Minimum Fuel
#41
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 25
Well, here's stupidity applied for you, and a good example of legality versus safety.
LAX-ANC is a LONG flight,
LAX-PVR is much shorter, but it's covered under turbojet flag fuel planning requirements. That means you carry a lot of fuel for a comparatively short trip.
Insanity? Yessir. Stupid? Definitely. Legal? Abso-lutely!
LAX-ANC is a LONG flight,
LAX-PVR is much shorter, but it's covered under turbojet flag fuel planning requirements. That means you carry a lot of fuel for a comparatively short trip.
Insanity? Yessir. Stupid? Definitely. Legal? Abso-lutely!
Last edited by Min Fuel; 08-14-2008 at 09:25 AM.
#42
We wouldn't have to worry about declaring minimum or emergency fuel if, according to one rocket scientist in the senate:
"if we all properly inflated our tires and got tune-ups, that would save more fuel than would result from drilling off our coasts and in Alaska."
"if we all properly inflated our tires and got tune-ups, that would save more fuel than would result from drilling off our coasts and in Alaska."
#43
Windsor said
How far off the planned burn do you have to be to generate a message to dispatch? One hundred lbs. is enough to trigger a message to dispatch.
And yes, P5 (prior planning prevents p*ss poor performance).
Here is another situation that is coming up in the ASRs. Dispatch gives you an alternate and crews have sometimes found they do not have the approach charts for that airport OR there is a notam which precludes an approach. This should have been looked at before the release was signed.
Also, in some cases, the nearby alternate is being used by everyone else and that airport gets slammed with arrivals it can't handle. Again, situational awareness and expierence become a factor. Just because everyone is diverting to airport A, does not mean thats your only option. Airport B may be just as good. Keep your options open.
So, yes, the earlier one begins to search options, the better.
How far off the planned burn do you have to be to generate a message to dispatch? One hundred lbs. is enough to trigger a message to dispatch.
And yes, P5 (prior planning prevents p*ss poor performance).
Here is another situation that is coming up in the ASRs. Dispatch gives you an alternate and crews have sometimes found they do not have the approach charts for that airport OR there is a notam which precludes an approach. This should have been looked at before the release was signed.
Also, in some cases, the nearby alternate is being used by everyone else and that airport gets slammed with arrivals it can't handle. Again, situational awareness and expierence become a factor. Just because everyone is diverting to airport A, does not mean thats your only option. Airport B may be just as good. Keep your options open.
So, yes, the earlier one begins to search options, the better.
#44
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 25
Thanks for the help on preparing the min/emerg fuel piece. Finished...
A run through the NASA ASR site showed there is a fair amount of confusion about what happens when declaring min fuel and what happens with emergency fuel.
And just in time to show that pilots are not the only ones who get in a tight fix about fuel...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/26/us...rssnyt&emc=rss
A run through the NASA ASR site showed there is a fair amount of confusion about what happens when declaring min fuel and what happens with emergency fuel.
And just in time to show that pilots are not the only ones who get in a tight fix about fuel...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/26/us...rssnyt&emc=rss
#45
New Hire
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 4
Lot's of interesting views on this topic... I've seen a few RJ's come in (mostly diversions) with some VERY low fuel states. Judging by some of the APU burn rates, I wouldn't feel very comfortable being the PIC on that flight....
Thanks for the discussion!
Thanks for the discussion!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Atreyu
Regional
16
08-11-2008 10:10 AM