Thread: Teardrop turn
View Single Post
Old 09-02-2008 | 05:46 PM
  #2  
ryan1234's Avatar
ryan1234
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: USAF
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
I was reading an article from the recent FLYING magazine and it described a mishap where a Cirrus student and his instructor crashed after attemtping a second "teardrop" turn - in this case it means turning back to the runway which you departed from after a (simulated in this case) engine failure.

I was wondering how many CFIs teach this. I remember being taught to land straight ahead - what was it - about 30 degrees either side of the flight path or so?

The article mentions that the FAA doesn't even consider this a valid maneuver and it is not a requirement for the PPL.

So........I'd like to hear what some of the CFIs out there have to say about this practice. Is there a valid reason? Pros/cons?

USMCFLYR
I can understand a power-off 180... if you're at pattern altitude, but a "teardrop" after take-off is just crazy... I think it even warns against that in the FAA Airplane Flying Handbook.
Reply