Originally Posted by
bored
RORWIZARD -
The idea is NOT to have a balance between FOs and CAs. There is usually always more CA positions than there are FO positions. That's why it's roughly 5 CAs and 4 FOs per plane. CA's get more vacation time and go to training twice a year, therefore requiring the need for more of them.
Something BIG is happening kids... something BIGGER than we ever imagined. NOPE! Something Mesaba has never seen before. Hold on folks, you thought the last 1.5 years was a ride? Strap in and get ready for this one.
You are either bad at math or reading comprehension.
Present Staffing: CA FO CA/plane FO/plane
MSP SF3---90----91----4.5---------4.55
DTW SF3---84----99-----4.2--------4.95
MEM SF3---53----55----5.88--------6.11
MSP CR9---75----68------6.25-------5.66
DTW CR9---82----77----
4.55*----4.27*
MEM CR9---32----32------5.33--------5.33
MSP CRJ---
94--84----5.53-----4.95
* Based on the the 18 total planes that are going to be based there.
510 CA/506 FO Currently
Proposed Staffing: CA FO
MSP SF3 92 91
DTW SF3 90 99
MEM SF3 53 55
MSP CR9 75 68
DTW CR9 82 77
MEM CR9 32 32
MSP CRJ
96 94
The only thing big that is going on here are RUMORS! Ones that pilots keep making up. These are below rumors. This is a bunch of made up BS by people on a message board every time a vacancy comes out.