Originally Posted by
Mason32
Go back and read it again. It was a seperate paragraph, after the one where I responded to you. If it were meant for just you, it would have been part of the same paragraph.
Fair enough, but you did a crap job of quoting/editing on the ORIGINAL.
As far as this "trained to think" bullsh1t, like I said, you really need to not make those kind of ASSumtions.
You said you were up to the bet, so tell me all about UAL's JS fiasco in 2005 and how you think it would be a good idea now.