Originally Posted by
slowplay
Two questions:
1. Was there any way the pension could have survived if it wasn't frozen?
2. Has there ever been a successful fight against a management in bankruptcy that wanted to terminate a pension?
The negotiators answered both those questions at the roadshow for LOA 51.
If you think they did such a bad job, what did you advocate doing and who did you advocate it too?
Slow-
My point- as I emphasized quite clearly- was that Reroute dismissed the full depth of concessions under Moak's LOA 51 as "...some other contractual changes..." while making a detailed point of other concessions under Malone's LOA 46. I felt it was important to remind our readers what the "other contractual changes" actually were. I stated quite clearly "I don't envy the Malone or Moak MECs for the battles they had to fight, but I think you were emphasizing the concessions taken under the Malone MEC and glossing over those taken under the Moak MEC." That was the point I felt needed to be made.
As to your questions- great topics for another discussion.
Soup