Thread: Comair updates?
View Single Post
Old 01-26-2009 | 06:42 AM
  #11822  
Ohiocrjfo's Avatar
Ohiocrjfo
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: CRJ 200 FO
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Many things go into a decision to award flying. Delta is trying to shift some flying back to the mainline. They are reducing the overall number of connection aircraft. From a pilot standpoint losing 2 50 seaters to one 90 seater is a bad deal. Jobs are lost. From a management standpoint its the plan for the future. Performance is still the key factor in who long term gets the flying. The one airline that has really made out well in this has always done a good job. One thing Delta tracks is the number of passengers a airline causes to misconnect. This is a key stat. A misconnect is very very expensive to the airline. ASA was last in this statistic prior to their sale and Comair was a close runner up. If Comair had been the top performing regionial in the Delta system the last 4 years the fleet makeup and size would be very different there. Delta would have also benefited since they own Comair and the value of their asset would have been way up. They would prefer to award the flying to Comair. They can't afford to do it if they are not going to get the passenger to their connecting flights.
Maybe you can explain to me how a misconnecting pax is soooo expensive to DAL? I'm not saying it's a good thing at all, but I just don't see the "large" expense?

Also the prior post reflecting JFK is spot on. When you have 40% or so of your flying coming out of the worst on-time airport in the country, (maybe the world) of course nubers are going to stink. Not only do we fly out of JFK as a base, but we also are the predominant regional in the Northeast. PHL, LGA, EWR, BOS, DCA, and IAD are not known for their efficiencies.
Reply