View Single Post
Old 03-14-2009 | 02:18 PM
  #40  
Tinpusher007's Avatar
Tinpusher007
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 27
From: 330 B
Default

Originally Posted by The Dude Abides
I understand your argument for what defines a regional aircraft, but it absolutely needs to be based on capacity, not range.
See that DC9-10 at the top of the page? Has almost the same capacity as the CRJ-900. 30 years ago that airplane was being flown on the same routes you're flying and those pilots were being paid a higher rate.
I'm not trying to pick a fight with you here, I'm just trying to make my point why I feel it would be wrong to allow range to define what is a regional aircraft.
I agree with you 100%. However I previously thought the Q could only fly maybe 800nm or so, not more than 1000. Getting it all under one list and cert will be a tough battle with mgt so long as it remains cheaper through contractors.
Reply