Originally Posted by
AirWillie
Civ flying doesn't come close to Military flying. I'm basing my "flame" on the questions that he was asking about all of which have nothing to do with why the crash happened.
Agreed. This is not about what experience the congressman has but on the lack of substance of his questions. You want the man to be credible based on his C-130 and military experience but his questions and letter to Colgan reeks of grandstanding and unintelligent media sensationalism propaganda.
If the congressman had done his homework he would realize that many regionals have pilots in their ranks hired with wet commercial licences. This was not just a Colgan thing but a fact for many regional airlines needing butts to fill seats.
Also he would have seen that the pilots had enough rest as mandated by the FEDERAL Aviation Administration. Perhaps he should look to his backyard in DC about why pilots can be worked 16 hours a day.
Lack of training? Well, again he should have done his homework being the super pilot that he is. The FEDERAL Aviation Administration is the one who approves the training sylabus for the airline. Again, the congressman should look in his own backyard.
I can give a rats butt about if this guy was in the military and flew fats or a 172 on the weekend. This is grandstanding and nothing more. If he had any clue he would realize that this is not a Colgan problem but a issue that affects all regional pilots.