Originally Posted by
AirWillie
How could the company just lay them off and replace them with outside workers? Isn't that why you have unions and contracts?
exactly... which is why more of us should be ticked off even more about this.... because they did it.
Originally Posted by
aviatormjc
Midwest pilots have the opportunity to fly the RAH's E170s (violation of RAH contract) instead of RAH but are required to take a pay cut in doing so. So now RAH must fly them, if they refuse then they lose their job too. What is a Midwest/RAH pilot to do?
So the Midwest pilots refused to violate RAH's contract... wish that worked both ways...