Thread: Small Community Airlines?
View Single Post
Old 07-13-2009 | 10:33 AM
  #40  
Captain1900
New Hire
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Laid off - looking
Default
Originally Posted by HalinTexas
The aircraft has NOT flown since 2005. It was never placed in a storage program, just hangared.

Don't say I didn't warn you.

Small Community Airlines showed me their aircraft, a J31 tail number N831JS that is in their hanger and yes it in parts going through conformity with FAA, just as it should be.
.

This aircraft was last flown the end of May 2009 when it was flown to DAL.

Why do you say “The aircraft has NOT flown since 2005” and “Don't say I didn't warn you”.

.
Why do you have such hart-burn for this company?

.
What did they do to you?

.
Are you the DO they fired?

.
You need to get your facts straight before making claims like “The aircraft has NOT flown since 2005.”

.
SCA showed me the aircraft they are leasing. The J31/ N831JS is the aircraft they are finishing their part 121 cert with, and they told me FAA is pleased with this aircraft.

.
I researched the flight activity of N831JS with FlightAware.com and it checked out.

.
It was flown to DAL at the end of May of 2009 just like SCA told me. During the month of April and May 2009 N831JS was flown 15 times for over 18 hours.

.
Here is the link to the flight data records for the months of April and May 2009 from FlightAware.com for J31 / N831JS and if you are a member you can go back and see more flights:

.
FlightAware > Live Flight Tracker > N831JS

.
This does not appear to be an aircraft that “has NOT flown since 2005”.

.
Before you go around casting doubts about the aircraft used for certification and the company, you would be well served to actually do some research.

.
I prefer to be positive and encourage a company that can create a great number of jobs.

.
Everyone is trying to get the economy started again and grow new jobs. I think we should support new start-ups and not attack them with false statements.

.
I hope they hire many.
Reply
0