Small Community Airlines?
#51
New Hire
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Laid off - looking
Again, my question: Is $35 to $40 per hour for a pilot, in a Jetstream "pathetic"?
So many of these negative comments sure sound like they could be sour grapes to me.
#52
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
For an FO, no that's not pathetic. For a CA, it's horrible. Should be closer to $50.
#53
New Hire
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Laid off - looking
In todays economy where most revenues are off 20% to 30%, it would make sense to have the pilot pay off 20% as well. I would expect that.
So if you say $50 per hour for a 19 seat aircraft CA is normal, less 20% to reflect todays economy and market, that would equal $40 per hour. How is that horrible?
Do you not realize we have all be laid off because there is so much "less revenue" at all the carriers?
How can the pay not be adjusted for entry level jobs?
This is the real world not the "I wish world".
#54
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
In todays economy where most revenues are off 20% to 30%, it would make sense to have the pilot pay off 20% as well. I would expect that.
So if you say $50 per hour for a 19 seat aircraft CA is normal, less 20% to reflect todays economy and market, that would equal $40 per hour. How is that horrible?
Do you not realize we have all be laid off because there is so much "less revenue" at all the carriers?
How can the pay not be adjusted for entry level jobs?
This is the real world not the "I wish world".
So if you say $50 per hour for a 19 seat aircraft CA is normal, less 20% to reflect todays economy and market, that would equal $40 per hour. How is that horrible?
Do you not realize we have all be laid off because there is so much "less revenue" at all the carriers?
How can the pay not be adjusted for entry level jobs?
This is the real world not the "I wish world".
Either way I wish you Good Luck, & hope it works out for you.
Cheers.
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: I like seeing everything :)
Apparently DOT is fed up with their lack of response
Small Community Airlines Order 2010-3-13
OST-2005-21822 - Commuter Air Carrier - Dallas Love Field, TX-Lake Charles Regional Airport, LA
Issued and Served March 11, 2010
Order Dismissing Application
By this order, we dismiss the application filed by Small Community Airlines, Inc. for authority to conduct scheduled passenger operations as a commuter air carrier.
Although repeatedly requested by the Department, SCA failed to provide the compliance information required by sections 204.3 (l), (m), (o), (p), and (q) of our rules (14 CFR § 204.3) for each of its new key personnel, information verifying the lines-of-credit and/or cash deposits available to it to support its proposed operations, audited financial statements, and financial information required by sections 204.3(k) of our rules. The applicant also failed to address discrepancies that the Department identified in its historical and projected financial statements.
By: Todd Homan
Index
Small Community Airlines Order 2010-3-13
OST-2005-21822 - Commuter Air Carrier - Dallas Love Field, TX-Lake Charles Regional Airport, LA
Issued and Served March 11, 2010
Order Dismissing Application
By this order, we dismiss the application filed by Small Community Airlines, Inc. for authority to conduct scheduled passenger operations as a commuter air carrier.
Although repeatedly requested by the Department, SCA failed to provide the compliance information required by sections 204.3 (l), (m), (o), (p), and (q) of our rules (14 CFR § 204.3) for each of its new key personnel, information verifying the lines-of-credit and/or cash deposits available to it to support its proposed operations, audited financial statements, and financial information required by sections 204.3(k) of our rules. The applicant also failed to address discrepancies that the Department identified in its historical and projected financial statements.
By: Todd Homan
Index
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
In todays economy where most revenues are off 20% to 30%, it would make sense to have the pilot pay off 20% as well. I would expect that.
So if you say $50 per hour for a 19 seat aircraft CA is normal, less 20% to reflect todays economy and market, that would equal $40 per hour. How is that horrible?
Do you not realize we have all be laid off because there is so much "less revenue" at all the carriers?
So if you say $50 per hour for a 19 seat aircraft CA is normal, less 20% to reflect todays economy and market, that would equal $40 per hour. How is that horrible?
Do you not realize we have all be laid off because there is so much "less revenue" at all the carriers?
eventually when you are no longer the junior guy you might understand things a little better.
Your proposition is little more than rationalizing lowering the bar even further. Listen, a professional pilot wage is part of the cost of doing business as an airline....
if you don't value your services, why should they?
go back to school, you're not done yet.
#57
Yes, and that is why they DIDN'T have to cut everybody elses pay....
eventually when you are no longer the junior guy you might understand things a little better.
Your proposition is little more than rationalizing lowering the bar even further. Listen, a professional pilot wage is part of the cost of doing business as an airline....
if you don't value your services, why should they?
go back to school, you're not done yet.
eventually when you are no longer the junior guy you might understand things a little better.
Your proposition is little more than rationalizing lowering the bar even further. Listen, a professional pilot wage is part of the cost of doing business as an airline....
if you don't value your services, why should they?
go back to school, you're not done yet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Past V1
Regional
61
01-22-2009 07:17 AM



