Originally Posted by
eaglefly
I wouldn't consider your ramblings to be any worthhile "production", so your demands that I live up to some imagined standard you've presented is illogical.
I can only say you place WAY to much weight on the arbitrators ruling as if that is the only (or defining) variable in this equation. You're free to believe anything you want about Eagle and its future, I'm just here to balance that to insure some our pilots don't take your comments as hard fact.
After all, you freely admit you're here to "bash" and that you do well, my friend.
Ok, so you can't argue facts... all you can do is BASH the messenger.
BTW, I'm an equal opportunity basher, and I'm sure if you poke around you'll see that to be a true statement.... and that I tend to bash, when the bashing is deserved... even if "you" don't agree.
My latest bashing has been Virgin America for being allowed to operate a foreign owned corporation doing point to point within the US (cabotage).
So, continue attacking the messenger instead of the message....
it's validation at it's best. If you could argue the facts, you would.
The FACT that you can't, and instead try to divert the topic towards ME instead of towards the facts speaks for itself.
Can we get back on topic now ?