Originally Posted by
eaglefly
This is what occured at Eagle in 1997 when our MEC at that time failed in its responsibility and handed our pilots an inferior contract. The pilots voted it down, but failed to place new leadership at the helm and then that MEC agreed to a few minor improvements and most importantly CHANGED THE REQUIREMENTS for ratification to virtually insure its success. The "new" ratification requirements on the second TA were met with the first rejection, so it was a shoo-in. This made ALPA national happy. In fact, they sent one of their reps to our roadshows for the first TA, touting it as the best thing since sliced bread thus solidifing their lack of concern for many of us.........and that was the FIRST piece of garbage.
DON'T make this same mistake. After you vote this down (hopefully)...........MAKE negotiation team changes as the original team who would agree to this has no credibility left and will be looked at by your management as manipulateable lackeys.
Best of luck.
This is not the only time ALPA dropped the ball and aided in the passage of a substandard CBA rather than to spend the resources on a meaningful negotiation effort.
Why would anyone opt for ALPA ?