Originally Posted by
xjtr
Wow. This is sad. What a waste. I'm sure at least half of these "qualified jobs" would be saved if RAH pilots were allowed to fly these planes for $23 an hour. Netjets FO pay rates of $60+ an hour was clearly excessive. I mean, for 5 seater jets?? We fly 100 seaters for much less!! What a wasted opportunity..
A; Netjets pilots aren't paid by the hour. B; Who are you to say what is and is not excessive for a company you don't even work for? I'm sure if you were a NetJets FO, you wouldn't be saying this.
To entertain your pointlessness....what does the number of seats have to do with anything? Not every operation's revenue is dependent on the number of seats. What about freighters? What about a GVI captain? Do you think that a Beech 1900 captain should make more just because there are more seats?
What about the thing called
the market? You have much to learn about the industry.
Forget your sense of entitlement. The
ONLY reason that you fly 100 seaters for "much less" is because you either accepted the job or your union voted to be paid "much less". It is nobody's fault but yours and/or your union. Stop trying to lower the bar by bringing others down and bring yourself up. That is the cold truth sonny.