View Single Post
Old 12-09-2009 | 03:12 PM
  #42  
Fly Boy Knight's Avatar
Fly Boy Knight
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: PT Inbound
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
He can not.

If he is flying as an SIC and the operators Operations Specifications require an SIC, then he can not by definition be PIC.

There is tremendous case law available on this, and a fairly well documented enforcement action involving a King Air 200 (also certified for single pilot) but the company Ops Specs required two pilots. The FO was logging time as sole manipulator of the controls on the part 91 legs. Some six months after being employed there, a minor gound incident - not with the FO controlling - resulted in the company records being looked at including the logbooks of both pilots. The FO was violated for EACH time he signed his name to a logbook page with PIC time listed for the part 91 King Air legs. His case was appealed tot he full NTSB panel, and the FAA's suspension was upheld.
The entire case, and many others, are available on the AOPA website in their legal case studies section.
Could you provide a link for this particular enforcement action deposition? I, and I am sure others on this thread, am interested in reading the FAA/NTSB's rational for upholding the violation.

AOPA's website is pretty big when you search, "Logging PIC Enforcement Action."
Reply