View Single Post
Old 06-27-2010 | 02:06 PM
  #75  
Bustin
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Gunga Galunga
I understand Inc's desire for 70+ seat jets, but with the whole "re-branding" recently to distance the company from the Delta stigma, why would they turn around and buy a wholly owned that does 100% Delta flying?
I think the rebranding was more about separating themselves from the ASA stigma than the Delta stigma. The company prides itself on being different than it once was (in no small part thanks to BH). And it just made sense to get rid of the Delta friendly logo when they're doing United stuff. Buying a wholly owned that does Delta flying is ideal because they wouldn't have to adjust their operations or learn a new system. Bottom line they just want to make money and that's a way to make more. Of course, no one even knows what's happening so this is all speculation...
Reply