Originally Posted by
CE750
Newbie is hardly relevant to the debate.
No one tried to make it one.
Originally Posted by
CE750
So let me ask you then... ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL why not give the edge to the guy who wasn't born with the silver spoon?
Before I answer that, let me say that I'm confused over what you are trying to say in this topic. One one hand, you seem to be pushing the advancement of poor minorities on the basis of their financial status. One the other, you have made an aggressive case that white females are hired over other minorities.
Which is it? Or is it both?
My answer? Hire the best qualified. Give no consideration to financial status. This is a business, not some liberal social engineering theory.
Originally Posted by
CE750
The topic is indeed mine, and my thesis which you clearly either refuse to accept as a result of a pre-held view on race/sex or because you just haven't seen it (which is negated by the fact that you're a veteran airline pilot).. is that.. (in caps for emphasis): WHITE WOMEN GET THE VAST MAJORITY OF AA's BENEFIT, WHILE THE WHINING IS 95% AGAINST RACIAL MINORITIES.. which frankly proves the point that discrimination and racism are alive and well..
Correct. I do not see any basis in fact that your 'thesis' is valid. It may be...but the monkey is on your back to prove it.