View Poll Results: Affirmative action, where do you stand?
None - free market of labor
86
80.37%
Racial - assitance only for racial minorities
4
3.74%
Gender - Assistance only to women
0
0%
Gender/Race - Statis Quo
6
5.61%
$$$$ - based soley on fincial need / economic background
11
10.28%
Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll
Affirmative action survey..
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: ERJ CAPT
Posts: 227
Onfinal
#92
OnFinal, I have to say you probably will make as good a lawyer as Tony. If you both take a class on legal research, evidence, trial advocacy and appellate advocacy, it would be a challenge and a pleasure to have the two of you argue your respective sides before me.
I wait with bated breath to see how this discussion unfolds.
I wait with bated breath to see how this discussion unfolds.
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: ERJ CAPT
Posts: 227
OnFinal, I have to say you probably will make as good a lawyer as Tony. If you both take a class on legal research, evidence, trial advocacy and appellate advocacy, it would be a challenge and a pleasure to have the two of you argue your respective sides before me.
I wait with bated breath to see how this discussion unfolds.
I wait with bated breath to see how this discussion unfolds.
But thanks!
Onfinal
#94
I also have met a few Cuban pilots.
#95
Indian Takeout Driver
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
nevertheless... every 3rd male in MIA metro area is a Cuban... I'd think there was a 1/2 dozen or more at a typical HS..
I agree that racial AA is broken however, and that we should re-visit it.
For example, a Hawaiian person who arguably would have no problem being hired in terms of discrimination gets to check off a "minority box" while a dark skinned arab american (forget Muslim, could be a Christian), is to be listed as "White Caucasian" ..
And another favorite of mine is the 1/8 American Indian guy who's got blonde hair and blue eyes, but his great, great grandfather raped an Indian woman during the wars out west and now he's a "minority".
I tell you, the best solution is financial assistance in the early/formative years to get minorities exposed to the career field (those who are so inclined) is the best solution, and the hiring then to be done strictly on merit (with tie breakers being at the discretion of the HR dept).
that's where I stand.
I agree that racial AA is broken however, and that we should re-visit it.
For example, a Hawaiian person who arguably would have no problem being hired in terms of discrimination gets to check off a "minority box" while a dark skinned arab american (forget Muslim, could be a Christian), is to be listed as "White Caucasian" ..
And another favorite of mine is the 1/8 American Indian guy who's got blonde hair and blue eyes, but his great, great grandfather raped an Indian woman during the wars out west and now he's a "minority".
I tell you, the best solution is financial assistance in the early/formative years to get minorities exposed to the career field (those who are so inclined) is the best solution, and the hiring then to be done strictly on merit (with tie breakers being at the discretion of the HR dept).
that's where I stand.
#96
I thought I already addressed this:
What seems to baffle you is that I DO read your posts, and it doesn't take that long to find weaknesses in your arguments. Letting them set for a while doesn't make them more correct. It took me less than 13 minutes to read your 8 sentences, and answer the most outrageous. WOW. Perhaps I should teach speed reading.
The problem is not my reading, it's what you're writing.
But you don't want to hear that. You want to think that there is a fundamental difference between the law and "programs." OK, fine. Let's try this little exercise. Name one program started under Equal Employment Opportunity Law that your theoretical neo-con (a term which you have subsequently admitted you don't understand) wants to eliminate. Name one program that is in place to ensure equal opportunity for all, regardless of race, religion, creed, gender, or disability that your "neo-con" wants to eliminate.
And when you find it, write slowly so I can read it, please.
It seems that you're so eager to make your point, that you leave out the opportunity to reflect on what the poster is saying. Certainly we will never come to agreement, or even closer to the middle if we behave in this way. And we won't have a Republic for long if we sanction this behavior.
In a nutshell, I spoke about the elimination of programs I said nothing about eliminating Laws. The Legislative branch of our government is tasked with creating Laws. The Executive Branch has tasked the various adminsitrative divisions to carry out the Laws. Sometimes this is done by creating among other things various programs through their offices, if they believe that the program will enhance or further the intent (spirit) of the Law. These programs and Laws can be challenged and then reviewed by the Judicial Branch of government in case they are found to be illegal or unconstitutional, respectively.
Please forgive me for all the bolding, but I am trying to be perfectly clear.
Oh, by the way: I have to admit, I really butchered LBJs quote.
Lyndon B. Johnson June 4, 1965
"But freedom is not enough. You do not wipe away the scars of centuries by saying: Now you are free to go where you want, and do as you desire, and choose the leaders you please.
You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and then say, "you are free to compete with all the others," and still justly believe that you have been completely fair.
Thus it is not enough just to open the gates of opportunity. All our citizens must have the ability to walk through those gates.
This is the next and the more profound stage of the battle for civil rights. We seek not just freedom but opportunity. We seek not just legal equity but human ability, not just equality as a right and a theory but equality as a fact and equality as a result."
In his commencement speech to Howard University.
"equality as a fact and equality as a result"
He did not advocate stacking the deck in favor of minorities, as Affirmative Action does.
.
#97
Indian Takeout Driver
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
What most people don't know or seem to understand is that most AA isn't born of any law, EEOC or Civil Rights laws, in this TonyC is correct..
Most of these are thru law suits, president set in (generally liberal) courts, and in many cases, (yes believe it or not), corporations WANT to have AA as part of their corporate culture. (hate to sound like a broken record) But especially with regards to women, as they're a huge part of the labor pool to tap into. If you're able to bring 50% of the population that is theoretically sitting on the sidelines into a labor pool that otherwise didn't participate in great numbers, then you've just cause the cost of labor to dramatically drop. Supply = Demand, remember that?
So not only doesn't it make hiring cheap for them in the long run, as they are able then flood the market with more "qualified" labor, but it also fits into their social agenda. Yes, corporations are not these "Conservative" entities people think.. they're as Godless and Liberal as the next Chinese Commie.
Doesn't require a degree in economics to see this at work.. I mean, how much are pilots paid now vs 30 years ago? Compare this with the FACT that demand for air travel is at an all time high.. so in effect, the cost of labor should have gone up, not down, but it did.... why? I'll tell you why.. add 10-15% more to the force than you need, and you've just dropped the price of labor in half.. Econ 101.
Most of these are thru law suits, president set in (generally liberal) courts, and in many cases, (yes believe it or not), corporations WANT to have AA as part of their corporate culture. (hate to sound like a broken record) But especially with regards to women, as they're a huge part of the labor pool to tap into. If you're able to bring 50% of the population that is theoretically sitting on the sidelines into a labor pool that otherwise didn't participate in great numbers, then you've just cause the cost of labor to dramatically drop. Supply = Demand, remember that?
So not only doesn't it make hiring cheap for them in the long run, as they are able then flood the market with more "qualified" labor, but it also fits into their social agenda. Yes, corporations are not these "Conservative" entities people think.. they're as Godless and Liberal as the next Chinese Commie.
Doesn't require a degree in economics to see this at work.. I mean, how much are pilots paid now vs 30 years ago? Compare this with the FACT that demand for air travel is at an all time high.. so in effect, the cost of labor should have gone up, not down, but it did.... why? I'll tell you why.. add 10-15% more to the force than you need, and you've just dropped the price of labor in half.. Econ 101.
#98
atp
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post