Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Affirmative action survey.. >

Affirmative action survey..

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC
View Poll Results: Affirmative action, where do you stand?
None - free market of labor
86
80.37%
Racial - assitance only for racial minorities
4
3.74%
Gender - Assistance only to women
0
0%
Gender/Race - Statis Quo
6
5.61%
$$$$ - based soley on fincial need / economic background
11
10.28%
Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll

Affirmative action survey..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2006, 01:46 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: ERJ CAPT
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by GotheriK View Post
To deny the obvious only goes to show ignorance.

Yeah, maybe I've just been living "outside of reality" for my whole life.
Perhaps reality lies somewhere in the middle, because this isn't obvious and their is no denial going on here. I grew up in NYC, Brooklyn to be specific and your experience is completely different than mine. But that is so much the center of egocentric/ethnocentric thought to believe that their experience is obvious and hence is the only experience with validity.

Onfinal
Onfinal is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:06 PM
  #92  
Administrator
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default

OnFinal, I have to say you probably will make as good a lawyer as Tony. If you both take a class on legal research, evidence, trial advocacy and appellate advocacy, it would be a challenge and a pleasure to have the two of you argue your respective sides before me.

I wait with bated breath to see how this discussion unfolds.
vagabond is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:14 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: ERJ CAPT
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by vagabond View Post
OnFinal, I have to say you probably will make as good a lawyer as Tony. If you both take a class on legal research, evidence, trial advocacy and appellate advocacy, it would be a challenge and a pleasure to have the two of you argue your respective sides before me.

I wait with bated breath to see how this discussion unfolds.
Vagabond, Well I'm just a lowly pilot, not fancy lawyer or anything! And this pilot needs to get ready for a 4-day trip. So there won't be much more discussion from my end.

But thanks!

Onfinal
Onfinal is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:20 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GotheriK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Bug Smasher
Posts: 120
Default

Originally Posted by CE750 View Post
Wow! And you want us to believe that not a SINGLE "Hispanic" at your school wanted to fly? In my short career in 121 and 135 so far, I alone must have flown with 10 cuban alone..

Hard to believe..
Wrong, I said I did know a cuban kid who wanted to fly.

I also have met a few Cuban pilots.
GotheriK is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:28 PM
  #95  
Indian Takeout Driver
Thread Starter
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
Default

Originally Posted by GotheriK View Post
Wrong, I said I did know a cuban kid who wanted to fly.
nevertheless... every 3rd male in MIA metro area is a Cuban... I'd think there was a 1/2 dozen or more at a typical HS..

I agree that racial AA is broken however, and that we should re-visit it.

For example, a Hawaiian person who arguably would have no problem being hired in terms of discrimination gets to check off a "minority box" while a dark skinned arab american (forget Muslim, could be a Christian), is to be listed as "White Caucasian" ..

And another favorite of mine is the 1/8 American Indian guy who's got blonde hair and blue eyes, but his great, great grandfather raped an Indian woman during the wars out west and now he's a "minority".

I tell you, the best solution is financial assistance in the early/formative years to get minorities exposed to the career field (those who are so inclined) is the best solution, and the hiring then to be done strictly on merit (with tie breakers being at the discretion of the HR dept).

that's where I stand.
CE750 is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 02:29 PM
  #96  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Onfinal View Post

TonyC:

I'm afraid I have to disagree with those who think you would be an excellent lawyer.

Well, I'm just crushed. I don't know if I can go on another day.



Originally Posted by Onfinal View Post

Again, you've failed to read the post.
...
For the second time, Please read and re-read posts before you write.
...
Please try to respect this by reading, considering, and then posting.

You know, son, you're really starting to annoy me with this recurring accusation.

I thought I already addressed this:
Originally Posted by Onfinal View Post

Dude take the time to read and re-read the posts. It seemed like you responded before I even hit the SUBMIT button.

In this, you accused me of posting Post #55 at 9:02 PM before you could hit the Submit button on your Post #53 at 8:49 PM. It's impossible to quote your post before you Submit it, but that didn't keep you from making the ridiculous claim.

What seems to baffle you is that I DO read your posts, and it doesn't take that long to find weaknesses in your arguments. Letting them set for a while doesn't make them more correct. It took me less than 13 minutes to read your 8 sentences, and answer the most outrageous. WOW. Perhaps I should teach speed reading.

The problem is not my reading, it's what you're writing.




Originally Posted by Onfinal View Post

Then you went on with a quite lengthy discussion of various civil rights laws that really became quite a bore.

Well I'm so sorry if you find the laws boring, but it's very clear that you don't understand them. For you to lump EEOC law with AA, MBE, WBE, and DBE betrays your ignorance of them.

But you don't want to hear that. You want to think that there is a fundamental difference between the law and "programs." OK, fine. Let's try this little exercise. Name one program started under Equal Employment Opportunity Law that your theoretical neo-con (a term which you have subsequently admitted you don't understand) wants to eliminate. Name one program that is in place to ensure equal opportunity for all, regardless of race, religion, creed, gender, or disability that your "neo-con" wants to eliminate.



And when you find it, write slowly so I can read it, please.





Originally Posted by Onfinal View Post

It seems that you're so eager to make your point, that you leave out the opportunity to reflect on what the poster is saying. Certainly we will never come to agreement, or even closer to the middle if we behave in this way. And we won't have a Republic for long if we sanction this behavior.

When you present something new, something that I haven't heard before, something that hasn't been preached before, I'll take time to consider it. So far, you've just regurgitated the same ole lines. I don't need opportunity for further reflection. And I don't think the security of our Republic is in danger because I can give you a speedy response.



Originally Posted by Onfinal View Post

So many on this thread have attempted to have a stimulating discussion of the topic without allowing it to turn into a slugfest. Please try to respect this by reading, considering, and then posting.

I'm not sluggin', yet. But I do find it odd that the one who called me "dude" is preaching about respect.



Originally Posted by Onfinal View Post

In a nutshell, I spoke about the elimination of programs I said nothing about eliminating Laws. The Legislative branch of our government is tasked with creating Laws. The Executive Branch has tasked the various adminsitrative divisions to carry out the Laws. Sometimes this is done by creating among other things various programs through their offices, if they believe that the program will enhance or further the intent (spirit) of the Law. These programs and Laws can be challenged and then reviewed by the Judicial Branch of government in case they are found to be illegal or unconstitutional, respectively.

Please forgive me for all the bolding, but I am trying to be perfectly clear.

Oh, I am so glad that you've exlpained the Three Branches of Government for me. I was a little bit fuzzy on that concept. Tell me, do those three branches kinda balance out the power of each other, so one isn't more powerful than the other? I seem to recall reading about that stuff somewhere. I'm not a very good reader, though, so I might have gotten a little confused.



Originally Posted by Onfinal View Post

Oh, by the way: I have to admit, I really butchered LBJs quote.

Lyndon B. Johnson June 4, 1965

"But freedom is not enough. You do not wipe away the scars of centuries by saying: Now you are free to go where you want, and do as you desire, and choose the leaders you please.

You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and then say, "you are free to compete with all the others," and still justly believe that you have been completely fair.

Thus it is not enough just to open the gates of opportunity. All our citizens must have the ability to walk through those gates.

This is the next and the more profound stage of the battle for civil rights. We seek not just freedom but opportunity. We seek not just legal equity but human ability, not just equality as a right and a theory but equality as a fact and equality as a result."

In his commencement speech to Howard University.

Yeah, you really did, not only in words, but in meaning.

"equality as a fact and equality as a result"

He did not advocate stacking the deck in favor of minorities, as Affirmative Action does.




.
TonyC is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 03:35 PM
  #97  
Indian Takeout Driver
Thread Starter
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
Default

What most people don't know or seem to understand is that most AA isn't born of any law, EEOC or Civil Rights laws, in this TonyC is correct..

Most of these are thru law suits, president set in (generally liberal) courts, and in many cases, (yes believe it or not), corporations WANT to have AA as part of their corporate culture. (hate to sound like a broken record) But especially with regards to women, as they're a huge part of the labor pool to tap into. If you're able to bring 50% of the population that is theoretically sitting on the sidelines into a labor pool that otherwise didn't participate in great numbers, then you've just cause the cost of labor to dramatically drop. Supply = Demand, remember that?

So not only doesn't it make hiring cheap for them in the long run, as they are able then flood the market with more "qualified" labor, but it also fits into their social agenda. Yes, corporations are not these "Conservative" entities people think.. they're as Godless and Liberal as the next Chinese Commie.

Doesn't require a degree in economics to see this at work.. I mean, how much are pilots paid now vs 30 years ago? Compare this with the FACT that demand for air travel is at an all time high.. so in effect, the cost of labor should have gone up, not down, but it did.... why? I'll tell you why.. add 10-15% more to the force than you need, and you've just dropped the price of labor in half.. Econ 101.
CE750 is offline  
Old 11-28-2006, 03:50 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 2,277
Default

Originally Posted by CE750 View Post
nevertheless...
And another favorite of mine is the 1/8 American Indian guy who's got blonde hair and blue eyes, but his great, great grandfather raped an Indian woman during the wars out west and now he's a "minority".

that's where I stand.
Yeah, baby. Let the truth be told about the Pilgrams and Mayflower b/c that's where it all started.

atp
atpwannabe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GDLBEN33
Hiring News
125
11-30-2006 06:58 PM
flightlevel270
Regional
0
11-02-2006 01:00 PM
Low & Slow
Major
0
07-25-2006 06:39 PM
RockBottom
Major
15
07-05-2006 07:44 AM
2 BLUE
JetBlue
47
09-12-2005 11:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices