I wonder what does a future Delta Pilots Association (DPA) do with the leaders we have elected in the past that is different than what DALPA has done with the leaders we had? My point is that I believe National ALPA and ALPA's problems are people and unless I'm missing something, DPA would have elected the same people they did for DALPA and the results would have largely been the same.

I mean sure, it is obvious that National ALPA has a huge conflict of interest with the RJ drain. But, isn't it up the the individual MEC's to determine the course and priorities of their negotiations when the time comes. Isn't CAL/UAL doing that exact thing right now?

Yes, national ALPA dropped the ball on pensions and age 65 and a few other things. But, we (and I use that word loosely) voted everything else in ourselves and our MEC's allowed it. I think we are our own worst enemy, not some organization. We allow our elections to be focused on popularity contests, not issues. We worry that the more "radical" candidates may be too radical and might bring the company down. We don't participate. And when we try to participate, we are shot down or ignored because we don't "know the right people."

While there are more than a few instances where DALPA did (or, didn't do something) that have occurred over the past few years that have made me more than a little mad, it is important for DPA to explain how they would behave differently if they were in place with the same elected leaders that DALPA had at the time.* If they can't, I don't see why their efforts aren't made towards putting different people in the right positions at DALPA and ALPA National.


New K

* What would DPA have done to save our pensions back in bankruptcy?
* What would DPA have done to keep Age 65 legislation from passing?
* What does DPA do that UAL/CAL MEC's aren't doing now to get rid of rj's?
* What does DPA do to mend the new rest rule proposal?