Originally Posted by
Lambourne
Why? Because I thought what he wrote was seriously flawed and presented a divisive stance. Also, it was requested by CONTINENTAL pilots in this very thread that I should contact him directly and nit just disparage him without seeking his reply. So, as requested I wrote to him. The first try was email that bounced. The second was via the PM function of this website. I didn't know he was CAL EWR until intrepid pointed it out. He has been online since the message was sent and has chose to ignore the request. My question to him was could he explain why he chose what he decided to put into print?
Jayson does not negotiate the SLI. That is up to people other than himself. He should let those appointed to the respective committees do their job and he can continue doing his day to day council work. He is creating expectations that may or may not be realized. This guy is a loose cannon and obviously a rank amateur in how to communicate from his position. He did not make the negotiations about ALL UCAL pilots vs UAL, he decided to make it about the EWR domicile vs UAL. If I was a IAH pilot I would be miffed that he chose to create the thinking that the only part of CAL that was worth anything was EWR. I don't just pin this on Jayson alone. The other two officers signed also. They are just as responsible.
Again I hope I get a chance to share a very brief conversation with them on their commutes home, on the last flight, that's full, on Christmas eve........
L
L-
Seriously, have you made your point yet??
Yes....I was the ONE who suggested to personally contact him as opposed to "voicing blindly" as to how you felt regarding Jayson's Magenta Line that was posted. If you seriously want to contact him, use his number (which does work) that's posted in the opening of this thread.....Judging by your continued disdain, IF it's still eating you that bad and your unable to have dialogue with him, have
your LEC Rep address him
with/or for you so that you can squash this.....I can tell you one thing, the repeated rhetoric is nothing but a "slow train to no-where" as it presently sits.
I will be the first to raise my hand and to say "YES", I don't agree with the manner in which it was posted in it being
constructive material during this Merger....no "If-and-or-buts about it". The posted Magenta Line in question was written for his LEC 170
Pilot Group....not meant to hang out there publicly to rub in anyone's face who may find it as "IN YOUR FACE" within your camp......In saying that, am I in ANYWAY giving him a pass??? HECK
NO....(Question that?? Read again....HECK NO).
As it's been stated already, both sides are PROUD groups, and neither group wants to be discounted anymore than the other in this Merger. Is rehashing over-over on how "your going to deny him the JS on your a/c when....."!! He too is a CA and "could" elect to get into a pi**ing contest in the same manner......At the end of the day, is either Pilot a 'better' person/or helping resolve this issue in going forward in the big picture as we "officially" become a single group (like it or not)??
Shoot.....Maybe we should let you two take it to the Octagon, that way we could sell tickets and call it a Unity Event. The Joint Pilot Group could then donate the proceeds to our "Self-Help" Fund for future use if needed for our JCBA??
.....So no one's confused, "Sarcasim".