Originally Posted by
DAL 88 Driver
Interesting how this article (at least the part you posted... I haven't gone to the link to read the full article) leaves the impression that the SLI is at least part of the impetus for pursuing new representation. Kinda sounds like they're trying to draw a comparison to the situation at US Airways. The problem with that is that I haven't heard or seen a single reference to the SLI as a reason to leave ALPA and go to DPA. I don't think this is about the SLI at all. From what I've seen, I think it is about a conflict of interest, a desire to have all our dues money and all our efforts in support of Delta pilots, and a desire to pursue restoration of our profession (and not be afraid to say it).
Well 88, this is from the AJC and one of DAL's tried and true reporters. She got the quotes. Just because something is not posted as one of the reasons there is a movement does not mean that it is not part of it.
Carl;
I beleive others have argued my following retorts to you on that subject.
As for the root problem. You have distorted some of the reality of DCI. Go Jets, Republic (all of em) and Mesa would be where your angst should be focused. Republic in particular (present day) Not on the regionals of the mid 90's that had fewer pilots than one seat in one base at a Delta. They were in check until guys sold scope to keep FAE up. It bit them in the butt. Now there is no need to worry about a FAE, and pension. It is still about scope. You were a pilot that voted in some of NWA scope sales. As vocal as you are why could you not change the minds of your fellow co workers.