Originally Posted by
Pineapple Guy
So, tsquare, you're saying a bill with 9 positive changes and 1 negative one should be killed because of that 1 negative? Seriously, I'm asking a legitimate question. Of course, we'd like 10 positives, or at least 9 positives and zero negatives, but those may or may not realistically be options.
So, is 9 good and 1 bad better than no change?
I'm in agreement here.
Overall the bill is a step in the right direction. I honestly don't have a problem upping the flight time to 9 hours if it's one or 2 legs. The rest and duty stuff is a significant improvement.
The 500 hour ATP thing needs to be dealt a very quick death, though.