View Single Post
Old 10-19-2010 | 10:16 AM
  #1425  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
DAL 88 Driver
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Trust me, I agree that we should be bailing anyone out. We should have agreed to snap backs on the wage concession, and we didn't. Now we have to do it the old fashion way. That means exactly what I stated before.
Well, first I'm going to assume that you meant to say, "Trust me, I agree that we shouldn't be bailing anyone out."

Now... if we had agreed to snap backs on the wage concessions (like you suggest), then we would have been getting HUGE pay increases right about now if not sooner. You seem to think that's okay, and you also say that we shouldn't be bailing the company out. So why is it not okay for us to get HUGE pay increases now until the company shows "six consecutive quarters" of profit with a 7-8% minimum margin? Do you see the inconsistency? I'm not trying to bust your chops, ACL, but you really are starting to sound like a company negotiator.
Reply